Recent Results
Musk is using <strong>space</strong> <strong>X</strong> to cover his Tesla losses. Exactly like he used tesla to cover his brothers solar city losses.
Totally illegal. Paid big fines. That's why they shut the sec. No more cops.
The number of <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> Mars landings in 2030 (and the year after, and the year after that…) will be zero.
Right, you don't understand the situation at all.
Historically having lots of engines yielded resonance problems: The engine vibrations got too complicated for engineers to deal with. This is why early spaceflight is biased in favor of fewer, heavier engines, such as on the Saturn V, such as on the Space Shuttle.
As you point out, the engines haven't been much of an issue at all, because <strong>SpaceX</strong> is pretty good at innovation actually and they figured out how to deal with that pr...
I heard that he sold it to government funded <strong>spacex</strong> and dilute that money to tesla
Didn't <strong>Spacex</strong> figure out how to fly all of those engines by the second flight though? If I'm not mistaken the engines haven't been much of an issue at all.
The trouble is, people were saying the exact thing a year ago. After Flight 5 they said Starship was basically ready for payloads now, the booster is now fully reusable, the Starship can re-enter and is ready for catch tests, they should do a full orbital launch with Flight 6 and deploy Starlinks by spring 2025.
But not every Starship launch is a new milestone progress beyond the last one. Sometimes there are setbacks that can't replicate the accomplishments of earlier missions or the new feats...
Theyre worried becuase he gets so much government welfare. If hes gone theyll lose favor with the kings. Hes a moron, he went to college for 1 week dropped out and became an illegal immigrant in the US and lied about it when he did become one thus he should be deported. Hes not an engineer he was able to let engineers take big swings and it worked out bc he was getting so much government welfare as i said. The <strong>space</strong> <strong>X</strong> engine is good in that it cheaper but not y...
Falcon's were flying for the better part of a decade before the first Heavy launch.
Starship isn't three rockets strapped together.
Saturn V kicked off with 5 engines.
No, nobody has flown a rocket like Starship nearly as successfully as <strong>SpaceX</strong> has. You're in a cult, brutha. Step away.
I'd say 1, maybe 2 if you're unlucky.
You're right, <strong>SpaceX</strong> does know how to fly lots of engines. Falcon Heavy flew perfectly the first time with 27 engines. I guess that makes starship an even bigger outlier since it *still* doesn't work.
The Saturn V had sent 7 crews to the moon by its 10th flight, and it was an even bigger leap forward than the starship.
$BPTRX holds <strong>SpaceX</strong> and XAi
i think we will be praising the technological advances <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> has brought on in the industry. paving a way for private space companies to operate along with competition and innovation we haven't seen since the Cold War.
and yet, there's still nobody competing with <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong>. self landing rockets were something my grandfather could only have dreamt of when he was a child. it was the stuff of sci-fi movies.
it's now reality, an...
I mean 2 and a half years seem like a reasonable amount of time for the scale of the project, they have had to build a lot of new infrastructure and do a lot of iterating in order to get to where it is now. It's a giant rocket that needs to squeeze as much efficiency as it possibly can in order to have enough margin to do full reuse, which is also something that has never been done before.
Flight count is also just a bad metric for measuring how fast Starship is going. <strong>SpaceX</strong> c...
<strong>SpaceX</strong> would be perfectly fine without him so its probably a good PR move to have him leave.
30 a almıştım bende fiyatlar <strong>spaceX</strong> roketi olmuş
Oh dear lord here we go again. An internet random on reddit calling of the most important human of our time, a fraud, If you’re out here calling Elon Musk a “fraud,” your brain must be running on dial up. Dude flushed his entire PayPal jackpot (north of $100 million) into Tesla and <strong>SpaceX</strong> **before** he was a billionaire, back when “visionary” was just code for “certifiably insane.” Name one other trust fund genius who’d yeet their whole nest egg into *two* moonshot industries th...
<strong>SpaceX</strong> most likely, I saw the rocket launching out of Vandenberg about 3 hours ago
You must be referring to the loan he took from the government, which he repaid in full, with interest? That is very different than "government-funded technology." He started <strong>SpaceX</strong> with his own money and private investors, and the designs were his own and his teams. The government actually tried to stifle him for years.
You're shit about crisper is also wrong
[CRISPR–Cas9: A History of Its Discovery and Ethical Considerations of Its Use in Genome Editing:
Irina Gostimskaya](...
Elon Musk's charitable donations primarily flow through the Musk Foundation, which he established in 2001. He has donated significant amounts of Tesla stock to the foundation, including billions worth in 2021 and 2022. The foundation's grants often support organizations and causes linked to Musk's business interests, such as schools near his facilities and projects like the XPRIZE Foundation.
Key details about his donations
Foundation focus: The Musk Foundation directs grants to various areas, ...
This chain of comments just rubs me the wrong way....
Yes, there are many people, primarily in the younger crowd, that don't watch local news. They get all their info from apps and/or websites on their phones.
If the headline isn't click-bait, eye catching or there're other, more pressing matters to read/watch about, stuff like this gets easily missed.
Heck, 4~5 years ago on this very sub-reddit, I was posting about rocket launches & space activities we could see in Hampton Roads (like wal...
It’s always <strong>SpaceX</strong>/Starlink lol
It's strange and wonderful to me that in comments here there are a large percentage of redditors that " GET IT" - "IT" being TRUTH!
The truth is that the Internet was basically born and originated from U.S. government–funded research in the 1960s and 1970s, particularly through ARPA’s Advanced Research Projects Agency) — later known as DARPA efforts to develop a resilient communications network. This work, carried out by researchers at universities like UCLA, Stanford, Utah, UC Santa Bar...
Everyone here trying to convince OP that the thing he had to navigate to avoid was a <strong>SpaceX</strong> reentry that launched *after* he saw it. Okay.
<strong>SpaceX</strong> launched a falcon 9 today from California. I didn’t have time to look up the trajectory but that’s exactly what they look like.
Yea, I have to agree with the other poster. Chicago isn’t hurting for economic development or tourists. We are… what jobs will this even create? Will there be jobs if tourism does not hit projected numbers? Brownsville has jobs regardless of tourism because their City Council was smart enough to make a deal with <strong>SpaceX</strong>.
Thank you! Because we do not have leadership who can innovate… it’s the same playbook on repeat until the City is completely debt ridden and the Spurs actually leave.
Austin does not have any sports team and they have grown significantly. Why? Tech.
Brownsville does not have any sports team and yet, they are prospering. Why? <strong>SpaceX</strong>.
Houston signed on with Eli Lilly for a plant to produce GLP-1s.
El Paso just signed on with Meta for its next AI data centers.
These are ...
Tesla and <strong>Spacex</strong> are pretty good companies. But the guy is a motherfucker, unfortunately. Of all the things he could be, he chose this. What a fucking waste.
Yeah, it's wrong. Starship was meant to be going to Mars in 2022, and first <strong>spaceX</strong> Mars landing was meant to be from a 2018 launch. 2024 was for the first human landing on Mars (and the moon)
First human starship mission was meant to be between 2022 and 2023, dozens of orbital missions were intended by 2022, first orbital flight 2020
Citation: 2016 elon musk IAC presentation, and every other statement out of his mouth since then.
If this video was recorded today and you are in Southern California then it was <strong>SpaceX</strong> Rocket.
I'm a grade 12 student attempting to create a mathematical model for the re-entry of <strong>SpaceX</strong> crew 10 for a project I am working on. I'm struggling to find telemetry data (specifially altitude and velocity readings) that's all in one place. I don't want to sit and record every second of the telemetry data that they have on the corners of their livestreams on Youtube. Most places I've looked do not provide this kind of data but long summarized data that isnt useful to me. Does anyo...
God <strong>SpaceX</strong> is so based
<strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong>, it’s always <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong>.
> ASTS will most probably be the leader of the market once their constellation is fully deployed
LOL. They have five deployed satellites, the first one they launched, 2019, has already decayed.
> The company attributed delays in the deployment schedule of its first operational Block 1 BlueBird satellites to supply chain issues and price increases. On September 12, 2024, the company launched all five satellites with its BlueBird 1–5 mission aboard a <strong>SpaceX</strong> Falcon 9 rocket. ...
For real, the only good thing Elon has going in terms of material, long-term success might be <strong>SpaceX</strong>, but that's only because the federal government stopped caring about pushing limits in space travel after the space race. NASA could do far better if it weren't a bureaucratic mess subject to politics.
I'm a grade 12 student attempting to create a mathematical model for the re-entry of <strong>SpaceX</strong> crew 10 for a project I am working on. I'm struggling to find telemetry data (specifially altitude and velocity readings) that's all in one place. I don't want to sit and record every second of the telemetry data that they have on the corners of their livestreams on Youtube. Most places I've looked do not provide this kind of data but long summarized data that isnt useful to me. Does any...
<strong>SpaceX</strong> currently uses SLC-4 at Vandenberg. I've parked at West Ocean and Renwick a couple of times for launches. 1st time was totally socked in, saw nothing, although the sound and shock wave was pretty cool. 2nd trip no clouds, got the full effect.
It’s always <strong>SpaceX</strong>
These folks haven't seen them in real life. I have. I spent a long time looking up: could they be drones, planes, satellites, starling, some debris from a <strong>space</strong> <strong>x</strong> launch, the international space station..... what makes the most sense is that it is \*\*beyond our current understanding and not easily explained by a worldview built around materialism and Newtonian physics.\*\*
The faith it takes to hold on to an outdated worldview is astonishing. SO many peopl...
Is this what a <strong>spaceX</strong> launch looks like!?
<strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> launch from Vandenberg SFB
[Sorry for the twitter link](https://x.com/<strong>SpaceX</strong>/status/1978869779956945380). <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> launched at 0034utc
I'm sure he can live on $142B worth of <strong>SpaceX</strong> shares.
>3 dimensions. Spirit World, Material World and Astral World
The Material (real world) is 3-D dog... It's the standard "<strong>space</strong>" <strong>X</strong>, Y, Z. Which makes the world 5-D hence higher dimensionality.
>is its own autonomous Subject which creates the real world
Key part is "Real World". There's only 1 not 22 or however many pathways there are. The "autonomous" pathways don't create extra dimensions there's only the one 3-D world. Perhaps rank 10 time gu could make someo...
>he'll be worth nothing.
he also owns $142B worth of <strong>SpaceX</strong>, parts of the Boring company, Neurolink, XAI etc.
Musk wants to be able to charge the thousands of unsold Deplorean that <strong>SpaceX</strong> “bought” from Tesla to some government contract so he doesn’t have to lose money on them.
<strong>SpaceX</strong> will buy them or some stupid borderline illegal thing.
There are two separate issues here
* Whether <strong>SpaceX</strong> will have full and rapid reusability in time for Artemis 3 in late 2028 or early 2029?
* Whether <strong>SpaceX</strong> will eventually get to full and relatively rapid Starship reusability?
My answers are no and yes but feel free to be more or less optimistic.
<strong>SpaceX</strong> Falcon 9 rocket launched Starlink 10-21 mission? Launched \~ that time on that day.
Once in a lifetime delay-<strong>SpaceX</strong> launch
link: https://v.redd.it/7pkkjjqzkrxf1
Likely is a direct response to the dumb articles over the weekend about Apple & <strong>SpaceX</strong> meanwhile we are doing the same, but better.
Showing
1
to
50
of
1039
results
Create Your Own Searcher
Monitor conversations across Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and more. Get instant alerts when your keywords are mentioned.