Recent Results
Getting payloads to Mars is ridiculously difficult, and nobody has done it reliably.
But, sure, <strong>SpaceX</strong> will do it commercially in 5 years...
It is patently absurd. I can't believe people give weight to anything Musk says, in both capabilities or timescales.
A absurd company that has been the only revolution in the launch space for… over 50 years?
<strong>SpaceX</strong> (like literally every single launch company) over promises on their deadlines. NASA’s own SLS system was planned in 2011… its first launch was scheduled for 2016, and its first actual launch was 2022. And it’s only launch. It cost $26.4 billion. Starship has so far cost $5 billion.
Stop associating Musk with SpaceX’s and criticising <strong>SpaceX</strong> because of him. This i...
Regardless of your opinion of <strong>SpaceX</strong> I think it’s incredibly cool that we have the knowledge and technical capacity to put large amounts of cargo on another planet
Also it would only be $500 million to put OP’s mom on Mars.
Until you need that one bit of info which no LLM has heard about. No google result exists. And the thing right in front of you needs fixing.
There is so much knowledge hidden behind the corporate world walls, it blows your minds.
A nice example is that when <strong>SpaceX</strong> started, they list a rocket because it started to move unpredictable in space. Every NASA boomer knew exactly what happened, because they encountered the same problem 4,0- 50 years earlier. It was in every ' how to bui...
Yeah but I don’t have an engineering degree. My masters and BS were in astrophysics. I feel like I need to pivot to computational fluid dynamics. That’s partly why I want to take the national lab job so I can work on my own research project related to computational fluids and get a paper out so I can showcase to companies like <strong>SpaceX</strong> or Boeing that I have the competency. Know what I’m saying?
1. true
2. I did not compare to openAI. https://imgur.com/a/5FyujXf see wikipedia. cost-volume-profit (CVP) - still not there. Yes, he is the 1st or 2nd richest. That does not mean about his company.
3. You mean - suddenly he got access to hundreds of physics graduates from school that he trained. F*off - most of them are former NASA employees that got annoyed with bureaucracy. Same is happening with <strong>spaceX</strong>. work-life balance is awful.
"We're gonna reach Mars" Well.. it's understandable for different reasons. Musk is pretty involved in a number of large scale industries Tesla, <strong>SpaceX</strong>, X, Starlink, xAi, and whatever else.
Also.. with no person having traveled to Mars.. going to Mars is UNCHARTERED territory.
It's been almost 53 years since anyone has even been on the MOON!
AFAIK we have to repeat that achievement again with our current tech before we can jump over to Mars unless you want the Mars mission...
Takes on with bunch of buzzwords. Musk has been public figure for years and this dude just cherry picked controversial moments. Honestly, i am not pro Elon. I just think that these kind of "destruction" speeches could be cherry picked to any public figure who activly engages in sharing opinions or thoughts. People are very good at critisizing and very bad at giving gratitude. You might dislike Musk, but he had really positive impact on the world. Paypal, <strong>spacex</strong>, tesla - all of t...
Someone already addressed this, its a <strong>spaceX</strong> second stage burn out before reentry.
Also Elmo recently raised capital through <strong>SpaceX</strong> and used <strong>SpaceX</strong> money to buy unsold TSLA cybertrucks to improve Tesla's book.
It's impressive how much money he can move around but it feels like a scam
ricordo che il primo robot umanoide ha cominciato a lavorare nella fabbrica di BMW a velocità umana
Tesla sta ordinando i pezzi per la produzione su larga scala di Optimus Gen 3, la "pilot line" è pensata per circa 180.000 robot annui, dicono che sarà operativa per fine 2026, sì è Tesla, arriveranno in ritardo, ma come si suol dire " a Tesla e <strong>Spacex</strong>, trasformiamo l'Impossibile in "in ritardo" "
Stiamo andando verso un futuro in cui molti lavori verranno rimpiazzati e prob...
And if you read the comments it often sounds like many people think TSLA == Musk (Starlink/<strong>SpaceX</strong>/Groq/X) like investing in TSLA means they are investing in all of Musk's companies. I guess there is some non-zero chance he somehow merges them all together rewarding TSLA shareholders, but it's not something I would bank on.
Happens all the time. Have you ever seen a meteor? They even have meteor showers sometimes too.
And unlike with space junk, sometimes—at a certain sweet spot of size and velocity—we may never know exactly what to expect from meteorites, in terms of size/mass and their composition, and the threat they might pose, if they can survive reentry with a decent amount of solid mass retained.
Compare that with manmade satellites and other <strong>SpaceX</strong> junk, which we have a lot of history and...
Bruh, I didn’t notice that :)))
I guess someone who uses Linux every day but still hates it might be a bit stupid :)
I mean, those people probably hate NASA, <strong>SpaceX</strong>, Tesla, and many other companies too — since they all use Linux.
What a childish act.
Starship is a much more ambitious rocket. <strong>SpaceX</strong> is also figuring out how to build it quickly and cheaply by building a ton. So for the Starship program they have a ton of hardware they can just launch and test. They don’t need to figure out the perfect rocket on paper first. They can just build what they want to test, fly it, and then iterate based on the results on the next rocket. They are planning to go proper orbital with V3 so next year.
It's a <strong>SpaceX</strong> Dragon carrying Starlink, not Starlink itself, that launched from Vandenberg. Starlink doesn't have the plume and just looks like a series of bright dots going across the sky
Probably <strong>SpaceX</strong> launching a rocket. This happens often in California.
That's a space jellyfish (not joking... that's what it is called). <strong>SpaceX</strong> launched from Vandenberg at 6:43 CDT. It's rare to see it this far away, but you got lucky. [Here](https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/<strong>spacex</strong>-falcon-9-launch-paints-glowing-jellyfish-across-western-us-skies-photos-video) is an article with a video.
I walked it through the LTE bands disabling them one by one. After AT&T it first tried to connct to Verizon on band 13 then band 5. Then it tried T-Mobile <strong>SpaceX</strong> on band 25 followed by a band 26 protection site. I will test away from the Dish network in the coming days.
Welfare hmm like government contracts <strong>spacex</strong>
"hand picked" from some extremely respected people in their fields and former NASA employees.
"worship" is wild. you're talking like a republican lmao.
people like you are incapable of grasping the effects on science and innovation Tesla and <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> had/have.
i don't see why everyone is in such denial about these 2 facts. **nobody** was making mainstream EV's until Tesla started outselling the big car companies.
and **nobody** started funding private spa...
1. Nice cherry pick of a tesla
2. OpenAI is losing money, doesn't make it a failure. This is common
3. This is a laughable statement on the relationship between <strong>spacex</strong> and nasa.
We're talking <strong>SpaceX</strong>. Defense and launch provider are massive value.
Shit, Lockheed marked a >$500 million loss a few months back on a classified project
Are you confusing Tesla for <strong>SpaceX</strong>?
Pretty much yes. There is some lag to the data since most of it is based on tax records. Anything <strong>SpaceX</strong> purchases has less lag since the Deed should be posted on government websites within a month.
https://<strong>spacex</strong>-buddy.web.app/
Building this for fun!!!
Have patience to sign-up check out😊
Oh so now you have ignored everything i wrote in my post and back to rhetorical stupid questions.
Cybertruck is a big failure compared which other electric pick up? Do you want to put some number or just regurgitate nonsense?
Which company he is running that is currently loosing money?
NASA did not do shit for <strong>SpaceX</strong> - infact in early days Elon went to Russia to use their engine technology after which he decided to go on his own. Infact NASA paid Boeing twice as much as <st...
What does he need €1 trillion for? <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong>?
>Electric cars are objectively a step on the right direction. Arguing against that is delusional.
No, they're a waste of time. He has deliberately sabotaged efforts to develop high speed rail in this country.
>He also made space travel far cheaper and more renewable which allows for more 0 G science to be conducted.
He has destroyed NASA's budget with his malicious DOGE program. NASA helped <strong>SpaceX</strong> by granting contracts and sharing technology, and he turned around and gutted i...
>Electric cars are objectively a step on the right direction. Arguing against that is delusional.
No, they're a waste of time. He has deliberately sabotaged efforts to develop high speed rail in this country.
>He also made space travel far cheaper and more renewable which allows for more 0 G science to be conducted.
He has destroyed NASA's budget with his malicious DOGE program. NASA helped <strong>SpaceX</strong> by granting contracts and sharing technology, and he turned around and gutted i...
Don't forget Quantum computers and also I think Google owns a piece of <strong>SpaceX</strong>.
Just because he did make money and so on does not mean you lick.
If you are not aware
- cybertruck big failure
- companies he is running are losing money
- <strong>spacex</strong> did everything only because NASA trained them
Mrs and Mr Zuckerberg (Facebook,) Mrs and Mr Bezos (Amazon,) Sundar Pichai (Google,) Elon Musk (Tesla/X/<strong>SpaceX</strong>)
<strong>SpaceX</strong> rocket taking off from Vandenberg Space Force Base most likely.
<strong>SpaceX</strong> is the fastest aerospace company in history.
The 'ruling class' today largely gets and stays there today by providing very difficult to replace skills that their workers and shareholders rely on. It's extremely difficult to fathom what key skills these billionaires would offer to their community in the event of total global collapse though.
What good is Bezos, Zuckerburg, Ellison, Musk, Thiel, or any of these fucking weirdos at running a luxurious survival bunker? They'll have hired someone with the relevant skills to do that job. That d...
Musk is using <strong>space</strong> <strong>X</strong> to cover his Tesla losses. Exactly like he used tesla to cover his brothers solar city losses.
Totally illegal. Paid big fines. That's why they shut the sec. No more cops.
The number of <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> Mars landings in 2030 (and the year after, and the year after that…) will be zero.
Right, you don't understand the situation at all.
Historically having lots of engines yielded resonance problems: The engine vibrations got too complicated for engineers to deal with. This is why early spaceflight is biased in favor of fewer, heavier engines, such as on the Saturn V, such as on the Space Shuttle.
As you point out, the engines haven't been much of an issue at all, because <strong>SpaceX</strong> is pretty good at innovation actually and they figured out how to deal with that pr...
I heard that he sold it to government funded <strong>spacex</strong> and dilute that money to tesla
Didn't <strong>Spacex</strong> figure out how to fly all of those engines by the second flight though? If I'm not mistaken the engines haven't been much of an issue at all.
The trouble is, people were saying the exact thing a year ago. After Flight 5 they said Starship was basically ready for payloads now, the booster is now fully reusable, the Starship can re-enter and is ready for catch tests, they should do a full orbital launch with Flight 6 and deploy Starlinks by spring 2025.
But not every Starship launch is a new milestone progress beyond the last one. Sometimes there are setbacks that can't replicate the accomplishments of earlier missions or the new feats...
Theyre worried becuase he gets so much government welfare. If hes gone theyll lose favor with the kings. Hes a moron, he went to college for 1 week dropped out and became an illegal immigrant in the US and lied about it when he did become one thus he should be deported. Hes not an engineer he was able to let engineers take big swings and it worked out bc he was getting so much government welfare as i said. The <strong>space</strong> <strong>X</strong> engine is good in that it cheaper but not y...
Falcon's were flying for the better part of a decade before the first Heavy launch.
Starship isn't three rockets strapped together.
Saturn V kicked off with 5 engines.
No, nobody has flown a rocket like Starship nearly as successfully as <strong>SpaceX</strong> has. You're in a cult, brutha. Step away.
I'd say 1, maybe 2 if you're unlucky.
You're right, <strong>SpaceX</strong> does know how to fly lots of engines. Falcon Heavy flew perfectly the first time with 27 engines. I guess that makes starship an even bigger outlier since it *still* doesn't work.
The Saturn V had sent 7 crews to the moon by its 10th flight, and it was an even bigger leap forward than the starship.
$BPTRX holds <strong>SpaceX</strong> and XAi
i think we will be praising the technological advances <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong> has brought on in the industry. paving a way for private space companies to operate along with competition and innovation we haven't seen since the Cold War.
and yet, there's still nobody competing with <strong>Space</strong> <strong>X</strong>. self landing rockets were something my grandfather could only have dreamt of when he was a child. it was the stuff of sci-fi movies.
it's now reality, an...
I mean 2 and a half years seem like a reasonable amount of time for the scale of the project, they have had to build a lot of new infrastructure and do a lot of iterating in order to get to where it is now. It's a giant rocket that needs to squeeze as much efficiency as it possibly can in order to have enough margin to do full reuse, which is also something that has never been done before.
Flight count is also just a bad metric for measuring how fast Starship is going. <strong>SpaceX</strong> c...
<strong>SpaceX</strong> would be perfectly fine without him so its probably a good PR move to have him leave.
30 a almıştım bende fiyatlar <strong>spaceX</strong> roketi olmuş
Showing
151
to
200
of
1225
results
Create Your Own Searcher
Monitor conversations across Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and more. Get instant alerts when your keywords are mentioned.